Why You Should Keep SQL at the Center of Your Analytics Workflow
Over the years, many tools have emerged that abstract away SQL-like analytics tasks and move them outside of the database. Some of the most common include:
Tidyverse – R
Pandas – Python
Polars – Python
Excel
Tableau
Power BI
KNIME
These tools are incredibly useful—I especially love Python and R!
But here’s a word of caution:
The farther you move away from SQL and push your data transformations outside the database, the more likely you are to encounter challenges such as:
Vendor lock-in
Slower performance
Less accurate or inconsistent reporting
Longer analytics development cycles
Difficulties in auditing and troubleshooting
A Better Mindset: SQL-First
What I recommend is adopting a SQL-first mindset—do as much work as possible in the database, then use external tools for visualization, modeling, or niche tasks.
For example:
In Tableau dashboards, I recommend building each component from a dedicated SQL view. All views should pull from a central, regularly refreshed detail table in your database.
In Python, if I need to run a machine learning model using
scikit-learn
, I pull only the necessary data from a SQL view—just the features and records I need. I don’t querySELECT * FROM table
into multiple DataFrames, join them in RAM, and aggregate them locally. Even though Polars makes this kind of in-memory processing much faster than Pandas today, it’s still better to offload joins and aggregations to the database.
Final Thoughts
SQL isn't just a legacy skill—it's the foundation of reliable, scalable, and maintainable data systems. Treat your database as the engine, and let everything else be the interface.
Thanks for reading.